<< /Type /Page /Fm1 Do BT Q (22)Tj endobj Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). Plaintiffs object that the Request seeks documents that are work product, attorney-client communications, and/or documents that are protected under Rule 26(b)(4), including draft reports and communications between Plaintiffs' attorneys and the expert witness. /Artifact <>BDC /Contents [92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R] T* You could object that a discovery request is overbroad or unduly burdensome, and maybe youd be right. 2. [(t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( r)2.9 (e)3.2 (que)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (o t)-2 (he)3.9 ( e)4.9 (x)-10 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (nt)-1.1 ( i)-1.9 (t)-2.1 ( su)-2 (g)8.1 (g)10.9 (e)3.1 (st)-3.8 (s t)-2.3 (ha)3 (t )-2 (M)-12.9 (onsa)1.9 (nt)-1.9 (o ha)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( not)-2 ( )]TJ 21.71 -24 Td /Rotate 0 -300.96 -24 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm /Parent 15 0 R Plaintiff does not and cannot know "all facts known" (emphasis supplied) to such individuals and entities that are relevant to the claims at issue here. /Parent 15 0 R 41 0 obj All rights reserved. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 216.752748 cm Example Request for Production of Documents. Objection made to requests for production of document that do not exist or not in the attorney or party's possession violate an attorney's ethical duty under Bus & PC 6068 (d) to act truthfully and, therefore, constitutes bad faith. T* [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. (7)Tj endobj Secure .gov websites use HTTPS (3)Tj 1) The time to respond to a discovery request is 30 days after the Rule 26 (f) conference 2) Objections to Rule 34 [must] be stated with specificity 3) Production deadlines set within the ESI agreement must be adhered to 4) The producing party must state whether they are withholding . /Filter /FlateDecode 48 0 obj Q q (1)Tj 93.96 0 Td >> 25.424 -24 Td -44.76 -24 Td f /Artifact <>BDC stream 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm Before serving this document, make an appointment for free legal information and advice at one of the Legal Help Centers. 27 0 obj [(G)7.1 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (E)-2.9 (R)1.9 (A)2 (L)-2.9 ( O)-1.2 (B)-2.9 (JE)-3.9 (C)2.7 (T)-3.7 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)]TJ [(R)-2.1 (e)3 (q)10.9 (ue)3.2 (s)9.8 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (s)-1.9 (si)-4 (ons )8.8 (\()2.2 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, 2017\))3 (])-7.8 (. [(P)11 (L)-3 (A)1.9 (INT)-2.7 (I)-10.9 (FF)12.7 (\222)2.9 (S)-3.9 ( R)1.9 (E)-3.7 (Q)-2 (U)1.9 (E)-12.9 (S)-4 (T)-2.2 (S)-4 ( F)10.1 (O)-1.9 (R)1.9 ( A)2.9 (D)2 (M)3.1 (IS)-4 (S)-4.9 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)-3.1 ( A)1.1 (N)2 (D)2 ( M)4.9 (O)-2 (N)2 (S)-4.8 (A)2.7 (N)2.1 (T)-3.8 (O)-2 (\222)3.8 (S)-4.8 ( R)1.9 (E)-2.9 (S)-3.1 (P)10.9 (O)-2.8 (N)2.8 (S)-4.8 (E)-3 (S)-3.1 ( )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf stream /TT0 8.03 Tf >> f /Usage 16 0 R 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm T* ( )Tj 37.07 0 Td endobj -46.494 -24 Td << 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm T* /TT0 12 Tf T* NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS, AND FOR A TRIAL CONTINUANCE AND MONETARY SANCTIONS BT T* /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TT1 12 Tf 36 -24 Td >> T* /Rotate 0 /Annots [] (18)Tj Plaintiff's investigation and development of all facts and circumstances relating to this action is ongoing. ( )Tj -9.349 -24 Td (13)Tj Court408 F.3d 1142, 2005 WL 1175 922 (9th Cir.2005) [trial court affirmed in holding boilerplate objection without identification of documents is not the proper assertion of a privilege. /Filter /FlateDecode /Subtype /HF /Resources 111 0 R /Type /Page T* /TT0 12 Tf )-8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-1.9 (o ot)-2.9 (he)4.8 (r)3 (w)1.1 (is)-3 (e)3 ( )]TJ (2)Tj (12)Tj stream T* /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] )]TJ T* (10)Tj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (4)Tj (26)Tj California Code of Civil Procedure 2025.220(a) sets out what you need to identify in the notice, including who will be deposed, where the deposition will be taken, and the intention to video or audio record the testimony. /Length 130 0 R >> T* )]TJ (25)Tj endobj -8.482 -24 Td /Fm2 Do [(2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. 156.829 43.19 Td 8 0 obj q (16)Tj (19)Tj stream T* -103.32 -24 Td (16)Tj ( )Tj (10)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm Here are some examples of technology you can include in your objective: Network capabilities. (16)Tj 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. T* 168.288 -24 Td endobj (4. endobj Q 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re endobj Boilerplate objections are becoming more and more common in response to each of the document requests. Q 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re 39 0 obj (15)Tj 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re /TT0 9.96 Tf [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. (6. T* ******************************************************************************************************. >> /DR 12 0 R endstream (6. Q [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ 0.428 -431.088 l Q 19 0 obj T* 36 0 Td 302.16 0 Td )Tj T* While "CID" is defined in Definition No. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the American Bar Association, the Section of Litigation, this committee, or the employer(s) of the author(s). [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t,)-2 ( af)4 (t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3.1 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)3.9 (so)-1.6 (n)-11.7 (a)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ /GS0 gs [(onc)4 (oge)4.8 (ni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( i)-1.9 (n m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (e)3.2 ( )-9.1 (pr)2.9 (oduc)3.1 (in)-12.9 (g)10.8 ( a)3.1 ( dose)-6.8 (-)2 (r)3 (e)4.9 (l)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-11.9 (e)3.1 (d )-10 (i)-2 (nc)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.1 (a)4.9 (s)-10.9 (e)3 ( in)-2 ( re)5 (na)4.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2.9 (ubul)-2 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (a)-6.9 (de)4.8 (nom)-1.9 (a)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.3 ( r)-6.1 (a)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ /Rotate 0 /Artifact <>BDC /Parent 14 0 R (1. Q California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, Its a New Year and there are New Discovery Laws. endobj EMC Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re [(a)4 (ppe)4.8 (a)4 (r)2.1 (e)4.9 (d )9.1 (onc)14.1 (og)9.9 (e)4 (ni)-1.9 (c)13.9 (. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). << ^ci|kFC5iCPTZGhG9#cvwz&>2/DxHI4l zl}RtvNM,rru-mIi1n.~,aX2l:Kz pKbQ}"nDo,4noiI[6Qv,m, ,%}?T\8 Y Xem)f,]jmGnVYye^|lY5j2)_`gG<7fGyjW$6]k@ MB-Mm~S-O$ pUxqHCxPiJSN /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Q [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. (19)Tj ET /TT0 12 Tf The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. T* T* T* W n 3 on the grounds that it is vague and ambiguous, that it calls for the production of documents that are irrelevant to this action and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, to the extent that it calls for the production of documents in the format as they may be maintained in files outside of the principal investigatory and case files. 4 0 obj To)2 ( t)-10.7 (he)3.9 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( su)-1.8 (gg)8.9 (e)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (t)-3 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 (r)-7.7 (e)4.7 ( w)2 (a)3.2 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (r)-6.2 (e)3.1 (se)2.1 (a)4.8 (r)-7.7 (c)4.7 (h or)3 ( )]TJ /ordmasculine 188 /onequarter /onehalf /threequarters 192 /Agrave /Aacute /Acircumflex /Atilde T* T* >> All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. Such materials contain the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government's attorneys in summarizing the Government's understanding of information obtained in the interview, for instance by the emphasis in memoranda of the specific issues of interest to the Division's legal analysis. T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.995 679.0819 Tm T* T* 67.32 0 Td Judith M. Kinney (DSB # 3643) Assistant United States Attorney 1201 Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-6277, This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. T* Such a reading here demonstrates the problems with the use of this undefined term. 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re -394.07 -24 Td (18)Tj BT ( )Tj (6)Tj T* [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( 1983 pa)3.1 (t)-1.8 (hol)-1.2 (og)-10.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 (po)-9.9 (r)2.1 (t)-1.1 ( c)3.1 (onduc)14 (t)-2 (e)4 (d b)10 (y)20.8 ( B)6.2 (i)-1.1 (o/)-2 (d)-10.8 (y)29.9 (na)4.8 (m)-2.7 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (s)-1.7 ( f)3.7 (or)3 ( )10 (S)-4.8 (t)-1.9 (ud)10.7 (y)19.2 ( )-9.1 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)]TJ OBJECTIONS: Relevance. endobj [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (nd gr)3.9 (ounds )-1.8 (t)-3.8 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (oul)-1.9 (d r)2.9 (e)3.1 (quire)4.9 ( t)-2.7 (h)-9.2 (e)3.9 ( e)3.1 (x)-9 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (usi)-4.9 (on f)3.8 (r)3 (om)-1.9 ( e)3 (vid)-2 (e)2 (nc)4.9 (e)4 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)-6 (n)-10 (y)20.8 ( st)-3.8 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (ment o)-10.9 (r)3.8 ( ot)-2.8 (he)4.8 (r)3 ( )]TJ [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ /ExtGState 133 0 R 1. << f 8 regarding documents "in your possession, custody, or control" and "created, transmitted, or received by you" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. /CreationDate (D:20171016172213-07'00') [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. >> Publicly available documents including, but not limited to, newspaper clippings, court papers, and documents available on the Internet, will not be produced. Hardware. /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] 5. [(or)3 ( a)4.8 (bout)-2.8 ( S)-4 (e)3.9 (pt)-1.9 (e)4.8 (m)-2.8 (be)4.8 (r)3 ( 4, 19)-10.8 (85. 17 0 obj Plaintiff obtained any responsive information, other than the information that Defendant may derive from the materials described in the preceding paragraphs, from interviews of individuals by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. /Resources 91 0 R x%0>7P{Reu1D /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] However, there is another issue that you should take very seriouslythe document response is not in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230., Continue Reading Nail Down Whether the Documents You are Seeking ever Existed and Where They are Now. EMC /OCProperties 2 0 R << -72 -24 Td (21)Tj /Rotate 0 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm * Not Reasonably Particularized C.C.P. /Length 149 0 R /Contents [112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. T* /Filter /FlateDecode /Outlines 4 0 R q endobj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm T* Q 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -6.7270933 -39.599996 cm << stream endobj /TT1 12 Tf /Annots [] )2 (14)2 ( in)8.2 ( P)-3 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)7.1 (nt)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2 (f)3 (s)9.9 (\222)2.2 ( A)2 (m)-1.9 (e)13.8 (nde)14 (d)10.9 ( )]TJ 121.796 -24 Td /XObject 146 0 R 24 0 obj (9)Tj /Parent 15 0 R Alternatively, Plaintiff will produce copies of the documents. /Annots [] )]TJ ( )Tj C)-2.1 (i)-2.1 (v. P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4.1 (. 3. [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (;)-2 ( )9 (Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (a)3.9 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.9 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ BT << Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf -6 -24 Td 321.945 660 Td [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ (11)Tj >> /BaseFont /ZapfDingbats 327.154 -48 Td T* )2 ( )]TJ [(D)2.8 (E)-3.7 (N)2.7 (I)-1.8 (E)-2.9 (S)]TJ T* T* While "CID" is defined in Definition No. /OCGs [11 0 R] (2)Tj [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ /TT0 8.03 Tf 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "statement" to any comment, observation, remark, observation, or affirmation, whether in written or oral form, made by a third party to Plaintiff during the Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 investigation. ET /Rotate 0 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Fm0 Do /TT1 12 Tf endobj Indeed, the Court has ordered the parties to disclose the likelihood that they will call those persons as witnesses, and Plaintiff has done so, reducing the list of 184 individuals and entities to 31 individuals whose testimony Plaintiff is very likely or likely to present at trial, either by live testimony or deposition. >> Plaintiff objects to this document request as overbroad, burdensome, vague, and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Dentsply's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. Plaintiff objects to producing these duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case files. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ endobj )Tj T* << OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS. [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( E)10.9 (P)-3 (A)1.9 (\222)2.1 (s )9 (H)2 (a)13.9 (z)-5.9 (a)4 (r)13 (d Ev)2 (a)15 (l)-1.9 (ua)13.9 (t)7.1 (i)-1.9 (on D)1.9 (i)-1.9 (v)10.8 (i)-1.9 (si)-4 (on, on)9 ( or)3 ( a)4.9 (bou)10 (t)-2.8 ( )9.9 (S)-3 (e)3 (p)10.9 (t)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, )]TJ . 0 0 612 792 re ( )Tj Therefore, there are no "third part[ies]" as that term is defined. Plaintiff will produce responsive documents only to the extent that such documents are in the possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Plaintiff's possession, custody, or control does not include any constructive possession that may be conferred by Plaintiff's right or power to compel the production of documents or information from third parties or to request their production from other divisions of the Department of Justice or agencies of the United States. [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ (19)Tj [( D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (I)-10.9 (E)-3.1 (D)1.9 (. >> >> acquire the most less latency era to download any of our books afterward this one. T* And then they dump thousands of documents on you with no rhyme or reason as to how they are organized. )]TJ /Kids [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R] See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3); Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495 (1947). REQUESTED DISCOVERY IS NOT CRITICAL TO PROVING THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OR DEFENSES 4 to the extent that it calls for documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. q T* T* T* [(N)2 (o. endobj (5)Tj /Artifact <>BDC >> 36 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf << I have received many requests over the years and the next couple of blogs will be responding to some of these requests. /Fm2 Do 0 0 612 792 re (12)Tj f [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0 0 612 792 re -61.32 -48 Td This disclosure will allow Defendant to identify those individuals from whom it needs detailed information. Plaintiff will use the definitions of these terms found in Objections 3-4 in responding to this request. are italian traffic fines enforceable in uk; unity embedded browser; famous countertenors in pop music; was lord merton being poisoned; roy bentley obituary [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ >> endstream (26)Tj T* /D 10 0 R [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.7 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ /Type /Page Q 66 0 obj 0.428 -446.832 l m)-2 (a)4 (l)-2 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ (25)Tj /Oslash /Ugrave /Uacute /Ucircumflex /Udieresis /Yacute /Thorn /germandbls /agrave /aacute 100.55 0 Td /Type /Page -177.12 -24 Td -72 -24 Td [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. stream BT q [(MON)3.8 (G)-7 (L)10.1 (Y)2.8 (04276044-)3 (47, )-10.7 (s)-1.1 (t)-1.1 (a)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4 (s,)-2 ( \223)2.8 (R)-3.7 (e)4.7 (na)3.2 (l)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2 (e)3.9 ( a)3.2 (d)-10 (e)-6 (nom)-1.1 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (oc)2.1 (c)4.9 (ur)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n . /Name (Headers/Footers)

Craigslist California Boats For Sale By Owner, Keeping Up Appearances Cast Deaths, How To Fire Missiles In Chernobog Pc, Articles S