They also think she killed her first hubby Larry Ford as well. Great catch. They moved into her house in Salisbury County, staying together for about two years. She made Joanne kill the baby PLEASE. (Nope. You, however seem to have no problem with these hurtful and damaging comments aimed at Rorrer. To prove it 110% rather than just 99% I dont know why they wouldnt retest the hair fibers etc. Vonda Smith: An Unexpected Twist . Youll have to make do with what you see here. Stop. Im sorry Sally, I know you want someone to blame for the death of your daughter and grandson, but the person who actually killed her is serving a life sentence in another facility in Pennsylvania. Search is on. One lengthy sentence which goes on and on and concludes with one of my sentences from a previous comment! You know the answer to that, the same as I do, which is. Dial-a-problem. Have you watched any of the documentaries Ive mentioned? An infant was lying face down on her stomach. I want to know why no one has answered this question: if there was no root found on the hair clutched in Joanns hand how was the lab able to produce all those results that could not have been found without roots??? It might have said no root but could have been wrong. Still, no good leads materialized. They tested the hair last night on Reasonable Doubt using updated technology it is definitely Patricias. After relocating to Pennsylvania, Patricia met the 6-foot-2-inch Andrew in a restaurant. Joann Katrinaks Killer Still Has Innocence Advocates(A Woman Scorned, Forensic Files). The "Wrong Man" team explores whether Vonda may have been wrongfully convicted. Rest in peace Joann and Alex. Patricia Rorrer will burn in hell, as she should. Under supervision of a doctor, 39 hair specimens were removed, recorded and logged. It says that Andrew reported the cut phone lines and broken pad lock was reported to the police at 10:30. Sorry, I must have missed your name on the witness list. I fail to see exactly why someone cant have an opinion which he/she sees as fact. At the trial, prosecutor Michael McIntyre alleged that Patricia remained obsessed with Andrew Katrinak long after their breakup despite testimony that shed had many boyfriends and live-in lovers to occupy her bandwidth. I have to assume its because her conviction is regarded as safe (which doesnt mean it IS safe, I know). Police say Rorrer put a .22-caliber bullet in the mother's head, strangled the baby and placed him . If Patricia had injuries it wouldve only been to her hands and she wasnt questioned right away which is also the reason she took Joanne elsewhere to kill her so her body wouldnt be found for a while and she would have time to return home. But it doesnt make a nonsense of her being the shooter, regardless of their speculation. Patricia Rorrer is as guilty as sin, and she needs to stay right where shes at. That, as well as measurements of the babys head (revealing the infant to be of a more advanced age) very much suggest they were killed some considerable time after what was believed at her trial. And dance instructor William Jarrett couldnt remember whether she attended his dance class at the club the night of Joanns disappearance. MY STATE OF MIND is based on factual information. So would judge and jury say. Plus a FB group that I was in included some people who grew up with her and they confirmed that she was indeed a horrible mean person who was easily enraged and always looking for a fight. They also found a photo of Patricia taken 11 days before the homicide. There are innocent people in prison. And last but not least, the fact that Michael McIntyre comes across as mentally unstable. The Facts Case Type: Crime We should be skeptical of those, like you, who suggest its obvious a jury got it wrong that you know better than 12 people presented with the evidence. Its true that women were more idiots than about men, they had the impression that if they caught a fool to take them as wives, they would settle for life, even today we see that but more diluted, still an exaggerated reason for murder. Justice is about uncovering the truth. Sir I would not kill somebody and I definitely wouldnt kill somebody I never met, Rorrer said. I therefore, perhaps naively, default to the judicial systems eventually getting the decision right. When Andy Katrinak comes home to find his wife and infant son gone, he summons the police and tells them he believes they have been abducted, and he suspects his ex-girlfriend Patty Rorrer might be involved. Patricia Rorrer was tried and convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of kidnapping in March 1998, in Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, for the murder of Joanne Katrinak and her infant son. Later, they both worked 12-hour graveyard shifts at a textile factory. Just saying. Patricia and her husband broke up after the babys death. Create a free website or blog at . The premiere episode will air following the series finale of Power. Watching this case on tv again today, I returned to this site and noted: I most definitely will not personally afford Patricia a platform, Michael said in an email to ForensicFilesNow.com She had her chance to answer my questions and tell her story in court over 20 years ago. Oh, and she was so obsessed with him that she started dating and found herself a boyfriend that was not only younger, but much more attractive than Andy? More hairs there. I hope she suffers and goes insane from loneliness. Rorrers defenders remind me of a case in my home town There was a killer who confessed, was caught on video committing the murder and was seen committing the crime by an eye witness. Stevie J Further to my previous comment, I should add the following. False. If not, how could Andrew have obtained samples of Patricias hair if they apparently didnt meet up in person after Andrews marriage? Then 31 years old, she had lived a rocky existence. All 3 of her alibis were lies, DNA tied her to the murder, there was no sexual assault, she had a violent past, was obsessed with Andy, and was caught lying about owning a gun, which coincidentally jammed after firing once and shell cases were found on her property. Forensic tests suggested the hair found in the car and at the murder scene came from Patricia. Most of all, Patricia said, she would like a rematch with prosecutor Michael McIntyre. And this was never disclosed to Rorrers Defence. State police and the Philadelphia division of the FBI appealed to the public for leads. The only thing that has changed since this case is the ability of people to access and proclaim crackpot ideas, conspiracies, and all the rest. Especially mice! Lehigh Cty.) There appears to be evidence of her disturbed thinking shortly prior to the event (inc her stating she knows who the perp was shortly after but would not identify because its her?) I thought the justice system in my state and the people were narrow-minded and corrupt. She failed miserably to convince me, or anyone else who mattered, of her innocence. Prosecutor pounds away. Two problems, then: a failure to see your own position as you see others (failure to comprehend irony), and failure to understand the difference between fact and opinion. Traupman claimed that when he reported the dispute, trooper Robert V. Egan III got mad and practically kicked him out of his office. The fact that there is LITERALLY NO EVIDENCE that Patricia was actually obsessed with Andy; they spoke as friends maybe twice a year. Someone had shot Joann in the face with a .22-caliber pistol, then beaten her about the head hitting her 19 times in all with a blunt object. They noted houses near the murder scene would have heard a gunshot in December, when no farm equipment is making noise, and question why the murderer didnt just kill Joann inside her house instead of risking being seen in public in her car. Well, at least you managed some sense there when you say that, especially when you take into account the amount of evidence and witnesses which were withheld from the Defence and what appears to be a clear case of evidence-tampering. That documentary points out that, despite the bodies of the two victims supposedly being exposed for several months, their condition remained relatively undisturbed by weather or animal activity. On December 14, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied Ms. Rorrer's petition for allowance of appeal, concluding her state appellate proceedings. Media galore. Very similar. In a million years, she wouldnt do anything to harm that.. Very soon after, the original hairs (in glass slides) were sent to the FBI again. Bully for you if youve read a lot and seen a lot: its meaningless to other posters and adds nothing to your argument for innocence. The obvious, if moot, response to this is to observe that her conviction wasnt based on inaccurate documentaries but on trial. Free Patricia Rorrer Strands of the accuseds dyed-blond hair at two crime scenes proved it. Answer 1 of 2: We are looking to get the ferry over to Helsinki from Tallin on 27th Dec 2020, so trying to establish if best to get an early (7am) ferry or a slightly later one depending on what time the shops/sight seeing attractions will be open - can anyone. I mean the husband did do some shady things maybe he was involved? The missing hairs probably got destroyed in testing.. thats how they test them.. and reports are wrong all the time. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. I believe in Patricias innocence and she deserves to be freed, at last! It could be coincidence, but I really doubt it. Out of the two hairs found in the car only one had enough root to perform a DNA match which did match but police waited to arrest Patricia until a highly advanced and accurate match could be made, which took a year. The police considered the possibility that Joann ran away, a theory disputed by her family. Your email address will not be published. No charmed life. The FBI even included a written report to that effect. If you so dearly feel the need to occupy the high ground in debate or an argument, have the decency to quote accurately. I most definitely will not personally afford Patricia a platform, Michael said in an email to ForensicFilesNow.com She had her chance to answer my questions and tell her story in court over 20 years ago. Ive followed and made a study of this case for more than twenty years and have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. While not a guilt sceptic, I suggest this was either ill-conceived expression or an expression of misguided mindset for its not for the defendant (albeit now convict) to convince of innocence but for prosecution to convince of guilt (and per appeal, that guilt is safe rather than innocence unproven). Yeah, no. Does it actually have to be an obligatory duty for anyone to be present at a trial before they are able to have an opinion? The prosecution alleged that Patricia called the Katrinaks house from a pay phone in Pennsylvania. This witness was never revealed to Rorrers defence. Are you even aware theres a strong suspicion that evidence of the hair, which was DNA matched to her, was tampered with? Microconidia DNA, as long as the strand is one inch long they can pull the DNA from that. Shame on your for defending a vicious killer. Meanwhile, the case of the missing mother and baby turned into colossal news across the U.S. and internationally. From my point of view this is an extremely similar case, with less class and style, and without the luxurious details that Interpols case had, such as the involvement of an extremely expensive Alfa Romeo car, and a revolver bought at a lush auction in Paris, which had belonged to a duke before the incident. This information was never revealed to Rorrers defence. Unfortunately, most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense, and theyre only more unlikely to do so, given todays social media. Further, an early FBI report said the hairs found in the car had no roots which contain the DNA suggesting an evidence switcheroo. Let her rot like she left Joan and that INNOCENT baby Alex. There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. Im sorry for the distress this awful business must have caused. I do. Its sad that some people just cant move on and continue to feel that what they want is going to be THEIRS regardless. February 8, 2020. Men who murder are conventional, women are sensational, posits the Worldwide Womens Criminal Justice Network. She is a tough one, Sheriff Gerald Hege would later tell the Morning Call in a June 29, 1997 interview. More likely it reflects a relative reluctance to execute females as well as the pendency of what will be the last episode of DNA investigation. simply to create an atmosphere of hatred towards a person who, in all probability, has been wrongfully imprisoned. This case is not over yet more to follow only trouble is, law moves along at a pitiful pace. Yet they insisted in the trial that the call came in on the 13th. I would bet MONEY that the first baby born to Patricia didnt die of SIDS. And I can back up that claim by the fact I have read, watched and listened to all there is to know about this case. I deduced my opinion to be fact because of what Ive read and seen and is supported by evidence which was never disclosed at her trial. Today, Patricia Lynne Rorrer resides in State Correctional Institute at Muncy, a medium and maximum security facility that has the highest rate of cancer of all prisons in Pennsylvania, according to a story from northcentralpa.com. you dont want to fall off and hurt your oversized ego. No show. It says that Andrew Katrinak passed his lie detector test. What a lame article. Im quite happy to accept that ANYONE who makes a TV documentary makes it for money. Look into it. This woman was obsessed and jealous. Calling her ex because she just likes to stay in touch w peopleLOL! Its nothing short of a feeble stab hoping to impress but really amounts to splitting hairs, or to put it another way, hot air with no substance. Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. And its argued that it has been and dismissed as insignificant or irrelevant. But let me say in my defence, I have not attacked anyone on this particular site with outright rudeness, to which you allude, albeit some of them deserved a retort of some substance. In fact it clearly shows how short you are on all the details surrounding this case. In TV clips, Andrew didnt come off as anguished. She was born on Jan. 24, 1964, in eastern Pennsylvania and moved back and forth between there and Davidson County, North Carolina. Ive scanned through of all my remarks on this site and nowhere have a seen a single remark that confirms your assertion that Ive been insulting. I believe the answer to your question is in my comment above. You seem to have a fragile ego. Or the ME and the entomologist that explained how impossible it would be for that baby and mother to be out there for four months, deceased at that, and still be as intact as they were, and the fact that the baby was double the size of a three month old child. She was born on Jan. 24, 1964, in eastern Pennsylvania and moved back and forth between there and Davidson County, North Carolina. Another glaring omission is Early in the investigation, the police in their zeal to add some substance to their fanciful theory about the gun used in the crime, did a thorough search of Rorrers back yard/garden (where they did target practice) looking for spent shells and bullets, in order to do a forensic comparison with the bullet recovered from the victim. You are not expressing an opinion but making an assertion or claim of fact: [I] have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. You are claiming innocence as fact there is no doubt shes innocent. They would have no reason to protect Andrew and lie on her. If you subscribe to Hulu and upgrade to Starz (theres a free one-week trial offer), you can stream the Wrong Man episodes about Patricia Rorrer. Go somewhere else where your asserted expertise will be professionally tested and you wont be so frustrated and insulting about those who disagree (with your expertise and opinion). On Instagram, I found a post for a two-part Win at All Costs podcast featuring journalism professor Bill Mousheys interviews with Patricia Rorrer from prison in December 2019.

Craigslist Naples Florida Mobile Homes For Sale, Sweat Lynn Nottage Tracey Monologue, Articles P